National Operatic & Dramatic Association
A Chorus Of Disapproval
THE PRODUCTION
Your programme notes again give a comprehensive biography of
the author whose prolific output is already theatrical legend,
not only for quantity but also for the quality of the scripts. A
Chorus Of Disapproval maintains this quality. The play had
its premier in Scarborough, (as ever) on 2 nd May 1984 and opened
at The National on 1 st August 1985 winning three “Best
Comedy” awards the same year. The film was released in 1988. Ayckbourn does not hang about.
STAGING AND SET
Because of the absence of a “set” the
different scenes were indicated by changes of props and furniture.
This was a disappointment having seen the great scenery for Sweet Charity, And because there were no identified location changes in the
programme there were a few moments of uncertainty as to where we
were.
LIGHTING
Not only was CHRIS DAVIES’ lighting
very well crafted, the changes were excellent. You obviously
reduced the lights for the scene changes but they needed to be
lowered further.
SOUND
DAVID MARTIN provided such well-balanced sound that his work
was virtually incognito. Both sung and spoken words were crystal
clear.
COSTUME
This activity was similar with its low
profile. ALISON NEWELL and CAROLINE RUSSELL had done a great
job by choosing costumes that matched the characters perfectly,
without falling into the situation where costumes speak louder
than the actor, which is often the trap for the unwary when dressing
a comedy. The identical outfits for Ted and Linda were inspirational,
as was Mrs Ames’ hat. When Hannah started her affair with Guy her shoes should have
been sexier. KAREN SYMONS obviously did a great job
with the wigs. I didn’t
notice who was wearing one.
THE CAST
Once again, THE CHORUS gave the principles
superb support without exception and it was great for every member
to have a name, even though it was a nightmare trying to identify
everyone, so if your name is not subsequently mentioned you can
be well satisfied with your excellent performance. It is difficult
to act, sing, and dance “badly” but
you made a brilliant job of it. Your concentrations and reactions
were 100%.
REBECCA HUNTLEY PIKE
CAROLINE RUSSELL looked great and had great
ability to play “vamp”. IAN AND FAY HUBBARD GINGE ANDERSON AND LYNNE IRVING gave great
performances as the decadent, amoral couple who set up Guy and “friend” for
a “swinging” night. They both played their parts with
relish and created a situation by innuendo and very clever implications.
The pictures on the forth wall and stage left were wonderfully
described by the clever script which actually says nothing but
relies on the actors to create the picture. And Ginge and Lynne
did it really well. Ian and Guy holding their heads at an angle,
to study the pictures was so suggestively clever and “Ill
get Fay to show you” was beautifully thrown away. Lynn’s
hysteria when she learned of her husband’s partner was a
joy to watch.
DAYYDD ap LLEWELLYN
JEFF EALES has a powerful stage presence
and is a highly talented actor playing the role with great enthusiasm.
His changes of attitude and behaviour were well done but directors
need to be careful when casting themselves in their own productions
especially in the leading role. I expect PAUL GARRAT, as co-director,
looked after Jeff’s
scenes but there was not enough control applied and I wrote O.T.T.
on more than one occasion. Ayckbourn does not need histrionics
and Jeff gave us too many. This is not to detract from the fact
that the character was built beautifully and was very funny. It’s
just that sometimes Jeff went to far and was unable to see and
correct his own faults.
DIRECTION
Which is where Jeff triumphed. Excellent positioning of groupings
with slick entrances and exits did show control and thought. The
rehearsal scenes had just the right number of mistakes and the
bad acting and singing hit just the right level. The fight was a moment of superb staging
and stood out as realistic, violent and faultlessly timed. The
ladies “dance” was
wonderfully choreographed and the final curtain was splendidly
ragged (I do hope it was intended)
STAGE MANAGEMENT BY DAVID MARTIN
The show was late starting and the final
warning giving “four
minutes” should have been “one minute” which
was why people were still coming in when the production had started.
The announcer did the same thing at the end of the interval but
corrected himself. There was nothing wrong with the scene change
method but it was too slow. You either need more hands so more
than one thing can happen at once or organize it better. People
were taking something off, then bringing on its replacement. There
were times during the scene changes when the stage was empty of
any activity. It needed tightening up.
GUY JONES
JEREMY MILLS was excellent. His facial
expressions, moves and gestures were wonderfully underplayed
and he gave a great first impression of “the underdog”.
His scenes with Dafydd were a great example of contrasts and
his attempt at dramatic poses was hilarious. This performance
maintained a consistent high standard throughout.
HANNAH LLEWELLYN
ALISON NEWELL’S first appearance
in night-clothes and her wordless rapid exit were an example
of wonderful timing and all her subsequent appearances built
up a great characterization with accurate perception of the part.
Alison delivered her lines beautifully and made intelligent use
of pauses. This and her body language created an initially submissive
wife but she was able to switch to her passionate side with just
the right amount of restraint. Her final song was beautifully
sung and was the climax to a faultless performance.
BRIDGIT BAINES
NICKY SHORT was very good indeed and her cynicism and exasperation
came over brilliantly with her contrasting roles of stage manager
and barmaid played to perfection. She played sexy and angry with
equal talent but her kneeing in the groin technique should keep
Elliott on his best behaviour.
MRS AMES
It is never easy to create a humorous character without words
but GILL BARRETT was excellent at it. Obviously used to hanging
around for hours, she showed a resigned acceptance and disdain
of the chaotic situation and the appearance of the newspaper was
hilarious. And that hat! Keeping it on for rehearsals created an
instantly recognizable type of character.
ENID AND TED WASHBROOK
ANGELA EVANS AND LES DEARLOVE gave good
performances, both as couples and individuals. Les’s reaction to Dafydd’s
tirade was wonderfully chastened and they reminded me of two of
Richard Briers’ neighbours who dressed alike, in a TV sit-com
whose name I forget. (Nick says – Howard and Hilda in Ever
Decreasing Circles).
JARVIS HUNTLEY PIKE
From his first lines, PAUL WOODSTOCK was magnificent, overbearing,
dogmatic, arrogant and brilliant. His self-conviction in his infallibility
came over very well and his moves and gestures along with his voice
gelled into a great piece of characterization.
PROGRAMME
I suppose the programme for “Sweet
Charity” set
a standard, which was hard for Nick Blanks to match, but although
the quality was good, there was a shortage of information. If cost
restricts your choice of content (which is not unreasonable) then
information about the cast would be more useful than a page on
the author. A list of songs and singers would help and possibly
a synopsis of scene locations. It is great to see such planning with the audition details for Gypsy. I would also like to know the secret of
Mr Ayckbourn’s
slow ageing process. He was born once year after me. I am sixty-five!
FRONT OF HOUSE
Once again the welcome was warm and the ticket side of the organisation
well organised. I have already mentioned the four-minute warning
and the two bar staff were under a lot of pressure in the interval.
FINALLY
This production continued the great start created by “Sweet
Charity” and it was good to see so many new names
in the cast list. Your bank of talent must be huge and it would
seem that you must have got something absolutely right. Thank
you for a great evening and best wishes for “Gypsy”.
John C. Draper |