Calendar Image

National Operatic & Dramatic Association

Sweet Charity Review

THE PRODUCTION

Later in this review I refer to your excellent program.

The “Sweet Charity” notes included were so very comprehensive that there is nothing I can write about the show that you haven’t already said.

STAGING AND SET – JEFF EALES & JONATHAN YORK

Both the conception by JEFF EALES and the creation by JONATHAN YORK were excellent. The view on entering the auditorium was a mixture of comparative simplicity but giving a great impact. It showed a creative imagination and subsequent changes maintained this standard. The elevator staging was ingenious and very effective.

LIGHTING – JONATHAN YORK

The Swan has great lighting facilities and JONATHAN YORK took advantage of this and generally lit his own set very well. At the very beginning the lighting levels were interesting but did they set the right atmosphere for what was to follow? Most lighting was great but I was puzzled by the unnecessary stage wash during Oscar’s solo. Overall this was a well-crafted and intelligent lighting-plot, which contributed considerably to the show.

COSTUME – JANE HARRISON

JANE HARRISON and her team had done a brilliant job, along with LUCY FRANCIS’ hairdressing and the perfect choice and dressing of wigs by KAREN SYMONS and MARGOT BARNARD. Scene 7 at the Fandango Ballroom was particularly well costumed, especially the ladies. The team created a wonderful kaleidoscope of colour, movement and visual pleasure.

THE CAST- THE CHORUS

If anyone asks you “what did you play in Sweet Charity”? don’t you dare say, “I was only in the chorus”. The principles were able to rely on your tremendous support and could be rightly confident that, behind them was a committed, enthusiastic and hard-working team whose concentration never faltered. It is impossible to mention everyone by name, but this paragraph applies to you no matter how small your role. Your contribution to the success of this production was hugely important and everyone took that responsibility seriously.

CHARITY - JESSICA CHARITY DAWES

Not only shares Charity Valentine’s name but also showed tremendous ability to play the part beautifully. Firstly she looked great with a fine speaking and singing voice. She was able to go from “tart” to demure and back again so smoothly. “Sweet Charity’s” script plays down Fellini’s prostitute characterization of the part but Jessica was able to unobstrusively bring it back in the scene with Vittorio but softened it with humour.

Her movements, body language and expressions were just right and she sustained a great accent.

On occasions we lost both some spoken and sung words due to her volume dropping and the pace increasing but this was mostly a performance of strength and power.

Jessica’s acting ability was apparent throughout but never more than her final scene with Oscar when she was superb.

Not for one moment did her character slip and she made this mammoth part very much her own. With a smile as radiant as her performance, the audience applause and the bouquet were well deserved.

DIRECTION – JEFF EALES

JEFF EALES sat just in front of me in the circle. This showed a certain confidence rather than pacing up and down somewhere with a large glass of something. And this confidence was entirely justified. This was a tightly controlled production with great subtle touches adding to the overall staging. An example of the control was the policeman in the lake scene. He appeared on spot on time, moved perfectly into position and grabbed the arm with total accuracy making a difficult move look easy. This slickness only comes with thorough rehearsal. The staging of “Big Spender” was a credit to Jeff and his choreographer. (More later) The scene on the ottoman in Vittorio’s apartment was a bit messy and although “Something Better Than This” was well done some of the movements seemed a bit contrived. The lift scene was excellent and the simulation of the subway train was probably more difficult than it looked and was wonderfully effective. The final scene was very well done and the final curtain brilliantly staged. My notes say “Enthusiasm and enjoyment on both sides of the footlights” Many congratulations.

HELENE & NICKY – JENNY DEWAR & EMMA SOUTHORN

Helene and Nicky played by JENNY DEWAR and EMMA SOUTHORN were not only perfectly cast as individuals but also made a great team whose partnership created a superb synergism. Their worldy-wise perception of Charity’s naivette” and their banter and repartee was pure Brooklyn. The “Dream Your Dream” duet was very well sung although now and again a few words were lost. They had a great balance between them and a great musical arrangement added up to a delightful song.

HERMANN - MARK BOLKONSKY

In my review earlier this year, I asked how MARK BOLKONSKY had time for a “day-job”. Not only is the ubiquitous Mark a busy performer, he dosen’t go for the easy route but takes demanding roles.

This is probably due to his considerable talent, which was apparent throughout the evening in a first class performance. “I Love To Cry At Weddings” was especially good.

URSULA – ELLA LOUISE KAY

Ursula played by ELLA-LOUISE KAY was a great portrayal of a gangster’s moll. Ella-Louise looked good with a great accent and played the part of the dumb blonde to perfection.

VITTORIO VIDAL - ANTONIS PETROU-AMERICANOS

Vittorio Vidal played by ANTONIS PETROU-AMERICANOS. Antonis had a good grasp of the character and brought great humour to the role. His singing voice was not quite uo to it for “Too Many Tomorrows” Although not helped by the music/voice mix and volume being out of balance he was off key for a large part of the time.

OSCAR LINQUIST - ANTHONY HARRISON

From his first entrance, then in the elevator and throughout, ANTHONY HARRISON gave a great acting performance with an intelligent interpretation of the role. He was able to move from humour to affection, to embarrassment and his final scene with Charity was played with a wonderful mix of pathos, indecision, determination and sorrow.

DADDY BRUBECK – MATTHEW FOWLER

“The Rhythm Of Life” was initially disappointing and lacked “oomph” but when the pace picked up it did improve. Really familiar numbers need twice as much work to avoid comparisons.

CHOREOGRAPHY– MATTHEW FOWLER

MATT FOWLER’S debut as a choreographer was a triumph. My notes say “great dancing” or a variation of the word “brilliant” fifteen times. There were courageous routines, flamboyant routines, imaginative and varied routines; and they all worked. Scenes that stood out were “Big Spender” “Rich Mans Frug” (especially the domino fall) “Theres Got To Be Something Better Than This” and “Rhythm Of Life” when it got going. The freeze at the end was brilliant. “I’m A Brass Band” was very good and during “I Love To Cry At Weddings” the routines by the five leading dancers were great. Matt is able the communicate his personal dancing skills to others and bring out the best in them.

MUSIC - PETER HOLT

PETER HOLT has assembled a highly talented and hard working orchestra. From the splendid overture onwards, the musicians proved that there is nothing to beat live music. He start of Act Two was especially good and the arrangement for Nicky and Helene’s duet was perfectly done. The balance was briefly lost when Charity was drowned during “Where Am I Going” and the male voices were lost in “Im A Brass Band”. For “I Love To Cry At Weddings” the balance, voices and harmonies were superb.

I just noticed your program describes the musicians as a “band” but I suggest “orchestra” describes them far better.

STAGE MANAGEMENT – CHRIS DAVIS

CHRIS DAVIS and all his team did a great job. Only once did the scene change seem over long, during the creation of Vittorio’s apartment, but for the rest the changes were smoothly, quickly and efficiently done. The show started on time and the interval was only marginally above twenty minutes.

FRONT OF HOUSE – MELISSA EALES

MELISSA EALES and her colleagues were great. My welcome was warm and Melissa was so very helpful during the interval, answering my many questions even though she probably had dozens of things to do. The audience will have felt very comfortable with the atmosphere you created.

THE PROGRAM – MARK THORBURN

It is not always that I allocate a separate section for this but there are program’s and program’s; yours was excellent. MARK THORBURN and JOHN GOOD HOLBROOK had created a professional, informative, attractive and well designed 32 pages. The size itself is ambitious but there was not a single wasted page and the meticulous attention to each section deserves high praise.

FINALLY

In your program you made the point that in March 2003 “The New Penny Theatre Company” was non-existent and Melissa kindly told me the story of how you became very much existent. After our conversation and reading through the program, it is obvious that the workload necessary to progress thus far in such a short time must have been tremendous, even leaving the production activity to one side.

I read in the credits, the acknowledgements, details of future productions, the advertisements, (which someone had to sell) the Sponsors (who someone had to find), the forward planning and the allocation of different roles for this production and future responsibilities. One can only guess at the number of hours and the level of commitment the group has given.

Keep up the momentum. You have made a great start and South Bucks and your chosen charities are the richer for your creation.

Thank you for inviting me and I hope to be invited back. “Break A Leg” with “A Chorus Of Disapproval”.

John C. Draper

 

 

 ort Photograph